On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:56:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:29:31AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:00:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 03:13:04AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > > OTOH, so far none of this has mattered: > > > "Past performance is no guarantee of future results." > > > > Sure, I figured most people would draw the same conclusions themselves, > > given the data. > > I see no evidence that people's opinions are leaning one way or the > other, yet.
For whatever it's worth: I think that the voting geeks recommendations make sense and I think that fixing a bug in our voting system--even one who's effect is statistically improbable--is a worthwhile use of our time. I support moving forward with this. -- B. Mako Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~mako/
pgpDZ2NPcPu4k.pgp
Description: PGP signature