Hello, On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:16:27AM -0500, Buddha Buck wrote: > As to why I prefer (2) over the rest... CpSSD is well-defined and > reasonably well studied when all votes are counted equally. I find the > idea of scaling votes involving particular options to change it enough > that its properties become unknown and unpredictable. It may be > severely broken in ways that CpSSD isn't. I'd rather have the core be > something we know is good. That means that I have legitimate FUD with > [3] and [4]. I agree with this. But doesn't the same argument apply to at least [5]?
Jochen -- Omm (0)-(0) http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/privat.html
pgp3SkrlErAFJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature