On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:48:13 +1000, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I have serious concerns about this ballot. John Robinson's proposed > amendment has been rejected by Manoj so according to the > constitution it should be voted on. Further it seems to address some > real problems in the new proposed system. Have you missed: ====================================================================== A.1. Discussion and Amendment 1. Following the proposal, the resolution may be discussed. Amendments may be made formal by being proposed and sponsored according to the requirements for a new resolution, or directly by the proposer of the original resolution. 4.2. Procedure 1. The Developers follow the Standard Resolution Procedure, below. A resolution or amendment is introduced if proposed by any Developer and sponsored by at least K other Developers, or if proposed by the Project Leader or the Technical Committee. ====================================================================== Now, as far as I can tell, John Robinson is not the Project leader, or on the technical committee, so there was no formal amendment to vote upon. manoj -- Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an Art. Mencken [Having the facts is hard. --ed] Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C