On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 04:02:42PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 08:41:25PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > After talking it over with a few people, I'm amending my proposed > > resolution to the following:
> > The next release of Debian will not be accompanied by a non-free > > section; there will be no more stable releases of the non-free > > section. The Debian project will cease active support of the non-free > > section. Clause 5 of the social contract is repealed. > While this is better than your previous proposal, I would still vote > it below the default option if it were on a ballot. Perhaps, in part, > because I will need to install some non-free software (patent restricted) > to be able to vote on that ballot. Er, what algorithms used by PGP are still patent-restricted? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
pgpIJbRXPhSyE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
