On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 06:37:19PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 21:19:23 +0000, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 09:00:09PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 03:10:59PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > >> > >> > and I've been following them carefully, and none of them have > >> > said anything appreciably more meaningful than "I want to keep > >> > non-free" or "I want to drop non-free". > >> > >> I think there's room for something along the lines of "I want to > >> spin non-free off as a separate project". Much of the concern over > >> dropping non-free seems to be about having things just suddenly > >> vanish. > > > We can't meaningfully pass a GR that determines what some non-Debian > > project does - so I can't think how that would be any different. > > > How is it any less meaningful than passing a GR that woulkd be > in contravention of the social contract? And not so long ago you were > a proponent of just such an action.
One can result in action, eventually. The other cannot. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
