> On Jan 6, 2004, at 17:59, Craig Sanders wrote: > > then by your logic, we must stop distributing GNU/FSF documentation,
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 07:40:58AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > If the committee currently working with the FSF on the issue does not > resolve it, then yes. > > Works not meeting the DFSG can not go in main, and without non-free, > they would not be distributed by Debian at all. Note that debian-private also does not meet DFSG, and is not guaranteed by the social contract. If the only point here is that debian resources shouldn't be used to distribute non-DFSG stuff we should place getting rid of debian-private at a higher level of priority than non-free. -- Raul
