Martin Schulze wrote:
Andreas Barth wrote:
* Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040226 08:55]:
We cannot include it in Debian anyway, since it is non-free. If Debian
stops distributing it but people will build ftp.non-free.org, what's
the different from the users' perspective? A new apt-line. Oh horror...
What do we gain from replacing non-free on Debian with
ftp.non-free.org?
ftp.non-free.org would not have to be maintained by Debian, contrary
to ftp.debian.org.
BTW I registred non-free.org for such cases
(and nonfree.org is registred by Perens)
ciao
cate
