On 02 Mar 2004 11:43:29 +0100, Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes: >> [...] Do you believe that developers should be (or are) equally >> willing to have a dialogue with people who provide criticism >> consisting of suggestions of alternatives, discussion of tradeoffs >> that can and should be made and helpful bits of code, or people who >> accompany their complaints with comments like "This FUCKING SUCKS! >> The maintainer must be incompetent or on crack" and requests for >> dismissal or replacement rather than useful assistance? > If you want to make a point, that's fine, but please don't abuse > debian-vote and "Questions for the candidates" for this, that just > wastes everybody's time. These are no reasonable questions. Please unsubscribe from debian-vote if you do not wish to hear the opinions of the candidates on politically charged issues as well as ordinary technical issues. You certainly have not gained moderator rights on this mailing list; so please refrain from attempting to so. The question above does seem germane, since it refers to in passing to an incident that drowned the signal on a development list of the project with non-technical noise; hearing the candidates views on how these issues are to be resolved would show their modus operandi in handling similar incidents in the future. manoj -- FORTUNE DISCUSSES THE OBSCURE FILMS: #3 MIRACLE ON 42ND STREET: Santa Claus, in the off season, follows his heart's desire and tries to make it big on Broadway. Santa sings and dances his way into your heart. Debian Project Secretary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://vote.debian.org/ 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
pgpCeGrGrL9df.pgp
Description: PGP signature