On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:33:56PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:57:35PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > > A, yes ? And the fact that debian ressource would be used for setting > > > this alternative archive up and maintaining those packages is not to be > > > considered ? Debian ressource in the form of volunteer time, which is > > > maybe the only asset debian really has ? > > > > Volunteer time is not owned by Debian. We have no control over > > volunteer time, and we cannot assign tasks to persons. > > But you are interfering by the time i should spend on things, in > particular making it more difficult for me to maintain my non-free > package ? A strange way of not interfering with my volunteer time.
His point is that this "time" is not time you spend on Debian, but on some non-free packages that happen to be distributed by Debian right now. So, just as Debian can not set restrictions on what you do in your non-Debian time, you cannot set restrictions on how Debian should help you with your non-Debian activities. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
