On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 11:58:27AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:40:18PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > That's part of what this proposal is all about. > > > > When we've dropped non-free, it's just Debian, no need to differentiate > > between 'Debian', 'the Debian project', 'the Debian distribution' or > > 'the non-free component of the Debian distribution'. > > Except, none of the introduced proposals get rid of this issue. > > One of them hides the current most glaring instance of it, but that's > not the same thing. > > Or maybe you don't consider the debian servers [and their contents] > to be part of debian?
What are you talking about? Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
