On 2004-04-26 10:35:02 +0100 Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Normally, in a political vote, "editorial change" is used to get
people to believe that a controversial change isn't, giving a minority
a better chance to get their vote passed while no-one is looking.
Like "normally" is used in a vote-related discussion to get people to
accept an assertion in the absence of evidence for that norm?
"Editorial" has a sense of the editorial opinion column of a
newspaper, too. I'm not saying what the intent was in this case, but
anyway, someone voting on only the title may be voting randomly. Not
much you can do about that.
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.