On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 21:17 -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > The recommendation is: "License your documentation under the same license > as the program it goes with. If you need to license under the GFDL for some > reason, dual-licence." > > I think -legal came to a very definite consensus that licensing the > documentation under the exact same license as the program was always the > right thing to do. It saves *so* much trouble.
People tend to ask "... but can I really use a license such as the GPL for documentation? I thought GPL was for software only." Do we need to address this point? -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
