Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Merle Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Would ftpmasters and mirror operators be able to "either include a >> machine-readable Transparent copy along with each Opaque copy, or [...] >> ensure that this Transparent copy will remain thus accessible at the >> stated location until at least one year after the last time you >> distribute an Opaque copy (directly or through your agents or >> retailers) of that edition to the public" anyway? I thought similar >> source distribution requirements were a practical problem just now? > Yes. It just requires a policy stating that each binary package must > include a transparent copy. This isn't terribly difficult, it's just > irritating. Given that I expect many people are about to upload non-free packages with GFDL documentation, it would probably be worthwhile to publicize this requirement more widely. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
