On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:36:05 -0300, Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 1/21/06, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> So, I am seeking arguments and guidance from the developer body >> whether issue 1 can, and should, be decidable by a general >> resolution, or whether the freeness of the GFDL licensed works >> without invariant clauses is incontrovertibly non-free, as the >> license is currently written. > Although I haven't yet made up my mind about the issue itself (i.e > if the GFDL without invariant sections is free or not), I consider > that it is a matter of interpretation, and not a matter of fact, and > therefore it can be decided by a GR. The issue remains happily moot unless that GR is actually proposed, though. manoj -- I hope if dogs ever take over the world and they choose a king, they don't just go by size, because I bet there are some Chihuahuas with some good ideas. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]