On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Russ Allbery wrote: > In that case, could someone please propose an amendment which captures the > *other* regularly voiced opinion, namely that GFDL without invarient > sections is DFSG-free but with invarient sections is not, and phrase that > in an appropriate form as an override of the decision of a delegate so > that we can be done with this and have all the options represented? Lots > of technical problems have shown up with the current amendment that tried > to do that and it clearly needs a revision in light of the discussion. > > If we're going to put all the options on the ballot, let's go ahead and > put them *all* on the ballot so that no significant group of DDs can later > claim that their opinion wasn't represented by the choices.
FWIW, I agree with you, however I'll only second them as I do not have enough time to draft them. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]