Em Seg, 2006-01-23 às 10:28 +0100, Wouter Verhelst escreveu: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 10:41:25AM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > > If you do not have any access to my encrypted or "chmod -r" copy, then > > I am not controllyng your reading or further copying > Really. If you maintain a copy of a GFDL'ed work on one of your > debian.org home directories without the world-writable read bit set, you > are in violation of the license, as written.
Hmmm... This made me think twice... The license is an agreement that regulates one action: the distribution, right? Is this clause enforcable to your private copies (considering it as a bug)? or just to the copies you distribute... I mean, I know the license says "the copies you make or distribute", but, by definition, wouldn't it apply only to the act of distribution? daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
