Anton Zinoviev wrote: > The text of my proposal clearly states that it is not a proposal to > modify the DFSG. It is not even a proposal to interpret the existing > DFSG. It makes some of the existing interpretations of DFSG invalid > but it doesn't suggest which interpretation is the right.
Then it _is_ a proposal to modify the DFSG: by excluding some interpretations, it makes the DFSG more specific. -- Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/ Princeton University GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
