Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, MJ Ray said: > > The current opinion of FSF, at least. In the past, RMS has > > worked against advertising clauses far less obnoxious than > > the FDL ones. [...] > > Er, we consider the 4 clause BSD license a free license.
I know. Did you just not read "far less obnoxious" in my post? > By comparing > the FDL and the 4 clause BSD license this way, you are making me think > that either you didn't know the 4 clause BSD license is considered free, > or you think the FDL is as well. If so, you are making me think your logical faculties are buggy. > Again, the FSF's opinion doesn't matter here. Not directly, but it does to some DDs (including me), and can influence the vote. Happily, not calling the FDL a free software licence is not contradicting FSF and is far less zealous than a past FSF campaign. It's a difference of opinion about manuals, not a fundamental break. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]