On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 09:58:55AM -0800, Mike Bird wrote: > On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 09:42, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > > I think I could accidently or deliberately slip something nasty > into a GFDL invariant section. For example, a manual for some > application could contain a polemic on the security advantages > of open source which lauded an open source encryption algorithm > that had subsequently been cracked.
If necessary, in addition to the text that encloses the invariant section you can state in footnotes that the algorithm has been cracked. GFDL requires to preserve all the Invariant Sections of the Document, unaltered in their text and in their titles. In order to fulfil this requirement you'd have to make completely clear to the reader which of the footnotes are part of the text of the original author and which of them are additions. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
