On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:30:45AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Nick Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In fact, Adeodato's amendment is clear in its explanation that "we > > believe that the GFDL does meet the spirit of the DFSG (so long as you > > have no invariant sections)". [...] > This argument-to-the-spirit is interesting: it is the claim that Debian > should > accept works where we believe that the intention of the license is > satisfactory, even if the actual letter of the license is not and we have no > clarification from the copyright holder.
Actually it's the opposite claim -- it's not about the spirit of the license that Nick's talking about, it's the spirit of the DFSG. Cheers, aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
