On 9 Feb 2006, Anton Zinoviev spake thusly:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:45:43PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>>
>> [ ] Choice 3: GFDL is DFSG-free and suitable for main in all cases
>> [3:1]
>
> I need to correct this. The title for my proposal is
>
> [ ] Choice 3: GFDL is compatible with the current DFSG
Noted.
> First, the whole text of my proposal talks entirely about the
> current DFSG.
>
> Second, my proposal doesn't revoke automatically the decision of the
> release team to remove the GFDL-documents from main. If my proposal
> wins, it is the release team who will have to change this decision
>
Err, that doeds not compute. If the developers decide that the
GFDL is compatible, then is it not tantamount to overriding gthe
decision taken? It is not as if the release team can go around doing
otherwise. The vox populi has power :)
manoj
--
One seldom sees a monument to a committee.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
