Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:20:13 +0200, Bernhard R Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> * Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060723 23:50]: >>> So not giving the SPI board oversight on how Debian conducts it's >>> internal affairs is sending an unfortunate message? Perhaps I do >>> think we should send such a message; and indeed, we should consider >>> the creation of a Debian Foundation, more sensitive to our eeds, >>> with a constitution that precludes it interfering with our modus >>> operandi or else it feels offended. > >> Thanks for making clear the GR is not about some issue or topic but >> to drive some of your personal rants. > > I strongly uge you to actually read the discussion on the > contents of the GR, and correct your gross misunderstanding of the > issues involved before actually voting on this issue.
Indeed - the discussion so far (and as far as I read it) does not back Bernhard's interpretation. There's been a sensible request to give one of the entities which this amendment talks about the opportunity to comment. I find your reaction to this very strange. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)