Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Our voting mechanism is *clone*proof, preventing multiple identical ballot > options from influencing the outcome; but it's not proofed against influence > by toothless variants that will inevitably appeal to a broader constituency > because they say less of substance.
If you think the Debian voting system handles compound resolutions badly, then why did you propose one? Hadn't you noticed that thread before? I want to read the Debian Voting System (J.Voss?) again before saying whether or not this is the case, but *if* you have harmed the chances of your proposal by unnecessarily making it a compound resolution instead of two independent simple resolutions, then I think that's justice. Best wishes, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
