Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> relevant part is this: >> >> >> 4. determines that for the purposes of DFSG #2, device >> >> firmware shall also not be considered a program. >> >> I as non native speaker understand that as this: [...] > > Yeah, but then way not say it clearly, and say that we will make an DFSG > exception for firmware, independently of them being programs or not.
I'm not sure if Steve really meant it the way I rephrased it, but I think it is. Of course there could be some more clear wording on this, right. >> In fact, I'd love to see some better rationale for the quoted point >> (#4) of the proposed amendment. > > I think the rationale behind it is : We want to keep the firmware in > main, so we say they are not program. This is the motive, but not the rationale why we (can) make such an exception. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
