Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >the non-free archive area which conform to all Debian Free Software > >Guidelines except guideline 2 (Source Code), or an archive section/area > >with equivalent requirements. > This may include proprietary kernel drivers and will exclude important > firmwares which are not legally modifiable. Both too much and too little > at the same time.
How would you exclude proprietary kernel drivers while allowing important firmwares which are not legally modifiable? Do you think that Steve Langasek's original proposal would exclude/allow those in that way? > I would otherwise support a similar amendment, but I > in this form I consider it harmful to our cause. Prove it. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
