On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:07:18PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > Because there appears to be some residual confusion[1][2][3] about > what I actually proposed and its content, here is the proposal as it > currently stands. The proposal is only the content between BEGIN > PROPOSAL and END PROPOSAL.
I like this proposal, and will soon second it, but there are a few points i will like to clarify : > C. Reaffirms its continued support of users whose hardware (or > software) requires works which are not freely licensed or whose > source is not available by making such works available in > non-free and providing project resources to the extent that > Debian is capable of doing so. "to the extent that Debian is capable of doing so." What is the alternative to that ? not ship it ? Or ship it in main until "Debian is capable of doing so" ? > D. Requests that vendors of hardware, even those whose firmware is I think "Request" is a bit strong here, i would much have prefered a less arrogant and will actually have more chance to be not dismissed out of hand by the actual hardware vendors. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
