Loïc Minier wrote: > On Sat, Sep 23, 2006, Ian Jackson wrote: >> Third resolution `We do not want to state an opinion': >> -8<- >> 1. The Developers note the existence and activities >> of the dunc-tanc project. >> >> 2. We do not believe it appropriate for the Project as a whole to >> address dunc-tank in a General Resolution. >> ->8- > > So, if this resolution wins the vote, it will contradict itself since > we will have had a GR on Dunc yet we find it not appropriate to > have one?
Technically it's not a contradiction: DDs can vote to behave inappropriately. :-) Still, it's poor wording. I suggest the following amendment to Ian: Replace clause 2 of third resolution with: 2. The Project as a whole chooses not to express any further opinion on dunc-tank at this time. This constitutes neither approval nor disapproval. -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud of it. So why isn't he in prison yet?...
