On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 10:54:34AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > I think everyone understands where I stand now, so I'll stop posting about > this, but my agenda in this is to ask people not to be so worried about > employment conflicts as to force strict barriers between Debian and the > rest of life. I spend a fair bit of effort trying to break down those > barriers in my own life. That direction would be the exact *opposite* > direction from what I think is healthy and most productive for me, and my > position on issues of this sort is far from unique at least among people > who work for universities (those being the people to whom I've talked the > most about this).
I completely agree, Russ. And I work for a manufacturing company. How would Debian benefit if I can no longer take the Bacula packages that I'm building for my employer anyway, and upload them to Debian? I certainly am not willing to maintain them twice, and before we decided to use Bacula at work, the Bacula packages in Debian were in such a mess that they had been removed from testing for months. This is a small example of the benefit Debian derives from people working on Debian at their job. -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
