Le lun 25 septembre 2006 09:42, Martin Schulze a écrit : > Martin Schulze wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 07:10:25PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > > > I'd say that I'm not more comfortable with Steve McIntyre > > > > > beeing involved and a DPL-assistant (or whatever name his > > > > > position has) either, so if Aj stops beeing involved with > > > > > dunc-tank, (1) is in fact half solved. > > > > > > > > Then shouldn't those who are attempting to recall aj also try > > > > to remove Steve from his delegate position? Because, as of now, > > > > it seems (based on the GRs on the table) that the only problem > > > > people have is with aj's involvement. > > > > > > Technically, if Aj is deposed, steve will be as well. And as I > > > said, if Aj is retiring from dunc-tank, then Steve's position has > > > to be clarified in a second stage IMHO yes. Nothing has been done > > > "against" Steve's position as DPL-Assistant, especially because > > > it's not "allowed" in the constitution. > > > > Umh? Why would Steve be disposed as well? I'm missing a crucial > > bit here, I guess. > > Oh, you were talking about Sledge and not about vorlon I guess, now > it makes sense.
oh yes, Steve McIntyre, not Langasek. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgp8K15ejPUFW.pgp
Description: PGP signature