On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 11:48:49AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 04:56:40PM +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > On 2006-09-27, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 11:36:37AM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote: > > >> 2. We acknowledge that there is a lot of progress in the kernel firmware > > >> issue; however, it is not yet finally sorted out;
> > > So, what progress has been made? > > All firmwarez have been readded to the debian package. > But with this amendment, they will have to go again anyway, so ... As we've discussed on IRC, 4 of the 6 firmware blobs reintroduced in 2.6.18 apparently have no license statement whatsoever that is intended to permit us to redistribute them, *even* in non-free. So they should go away regardless of the kind of exception the project grants for etch. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]