On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:35:51AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:14:57 -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > > On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 08:44:36 +0200, Sven Luther > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> Denis, if this issue gets voted before the clarification of the > >> firmware stuff, i would take this extremely bad. Please wait your > >> turn, and favour issues which are technically important above bass > >> politcking. > > > This is wrong. Denis, do feel free to call for a vote as > > soon > > as you think there has been enough discussion. There is no need for > > any proposal to wait upon any other proposal. If you want, we can > > start vote on this and any other pending proposal this weekend. > > Err, I should have stated that "as long as the minimum > discussion period is over". Denis's proposal awas seconded around 21 > Sep 2006, so we are still in minimum discussion for that.
Absolutely, this is why I asked Anthony if he was willing to shorten the disussion/vote period, as allowed by the Constitution. Anyway I will prepare the requested documents just in case. > Sorry about that. There have been so many of these proposals > floating around I am beginning to lose track. My bad, I should have mentioned this fact in my previous mail. Thanks for your time. Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]