On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 10:07:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Hello, > > Ok, since the proposal in its amended by Manoj form passed, we need to add an > amendment to this proposal, accordying to Manoj, so that we don't have two > proposals in effect at the same time, leaving it a full mess.
Which 2 proposals are in effect that conflict? We only had 1 vote on this as far as I know, so I don't see how it can conflict. > > So, i propose this amendment, as discussed with Manoj, and need your seconds > on this one too. > > === START OF PROPOSAL === [...] > 5. We further note that some of these firmware do not have individual > license, > and thus implicitly fall under the generic linux kernel GPL license. > We will include these firmware in Debian Etch and review them after the > release. Vendors of such firmware may wish to investigate the licensing > terms, and make sure the GPL distribution conditions are respected, > especially with regards to source availability. > > 6. We will include those firmware into the debian linux kernel package as > well > as the installer components (.udebs) used by the debian-installer. > ==== END OF PROPOSAL ==== > > Only change, is the addition of clause 0. which states the override. I am not > totally satisfied by this text, so if someone has a better idea, it would be > nice. Atleast points 5 and 6 aren't in GR we voted on either. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]