On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:58:06PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2007-02-08, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >> Content-Disposition: inline > >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >> > >> Dear Debian voters, > >> > >> I hereby propose the following General Resolution for sponsoring. > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> The Debian project resolves that Debian developers allowed to perform > >> combined source and binary packages uploads should be allowed to perform > >> binary-only packages uploads for the same set of architectures. > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Why do you want to lose the ability to do src+bin uploads for arm+alpha? > > > > Or shouldn't there be a "all release candidate archs" somewhere in > > there? > > Huh? I read it as the exact opposite. > > [...] In short: src+bin uploads are currently allowed. ^^^^^^^^^
All stands in that _currently_. Bill's GR proposal says: if a dd $X has src+bin upload rights on $arch, then he should have bin-only upload rights on $arch. You can make that statement true by refuting the premise: This is true if $X can do binary-only uploads, but ALSO if he cannot do src+bin uploads on $arch. Meaning that in order to "apply" such a GR, if the ftp-master forbids src+bin-uploads for alpha and arm[0] for people that do not have binary-only upload rights, they would comply with the GR. Oh and yes, given some custom dak rules that forbids debian-policy uploads, I believe some ftp-master at least have shown they can chose to actually implement restrictions the twisted way. Cheers, [0] since it's what this GR targets if I'm not mistaken -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgp5BhnJyTQkk.pgp
Description: PGP signature