Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:58:46AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > > What says SPI only listens to the DPL, not the project? AIUI, the DPL > > is appointed as an adviser to SPI's board, not a veto. > > Further down the resolution, which you snipped: > ---- snip ---- > Following informal discussions of Associated Project status with members > of the community, if satisfied the SPI Board will pass a resolution > inviting the project to become Associated with SPI. > > This resolution will state the SPI Board's current understanding of who > is authorised to act for the project; it will invite the project to join > with SPI according to this Framework; and it will state a date at which > the invitation will lapse if not accepted. > ---- snip ----
Yes, but sorry if this question was unclear: What says SPI only listens to the DPL, not the project? For example, what is the relevance of the above copy-pasted block? Does debian's invitation state that only the DPL is authorised to act, or is the Secretary authorised to act by sending other decisions to SPI, or is this an undefined thing that the spi-board are showing public unity about, or something else? If only the DPL is authorised to act in SPI's eyes, is that SPI interfering in the decision-making of the project? (by ignoring most of the processes) In case anyone hasn't noticed, it seems very difficult to get anything like a straight answer out of most of the current SPI board lately. Try it for yourself. Fun for all the debian family. Knock one over, win a coconut and five tons of flax! -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
