Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's because you only take into account controversial GR. Not all GR > need to be controversial. Sometimes I'm tempted to use GRs to try have some > official position statements from Debian on some topics.
Unfortunately, recent GRs seem to have reached a vote as proposal || alternate || alternate || alternate with very little overlap between the alternatives. I don't think that's a good way to find a compromise, but DDs seem reluctant to second and put more options on the ballot. Condorcet works better with several overlapping options, IMO. I think we need to be more liberal at putting options on the ballot. One way to do that is more practice. Regards, -- MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Experienced webmaster-developers for hire http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ Also: statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder, workers co-op. Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]