Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 01:48:44PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: [...] > > Personally, I expect soc-ctte to do something to support the existing > > situation when they think it's fair overall. We've seen situations > > where doing nothing has allowed complaints to fester. > > Well, that's like saying they should act on common sense. Why would we ever > want to say that it should support an existing situation even if it is > not fair?
Am I being trolled? I mean that soc-ctte should either: 1. do something to support an existing fair situation; 2. seek replacement of an unfair situation. That is, doing nothing about a problem, becoming another /dev/null alias, should not be a regular option. > Please see Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on -project > for my last take on this general stance. What bit? "placing emphasis on existing practice rather than novel ideas"? Seems to me like a soc-ctte that is expected to rubber stamp even unfair practices, but maybe the mail didn't include enough context. > > I prefer to keep this topic on a development list, rather than hidden > > on a miscellaneous one. It's developers who may vote on it. > > Uhh, debian-project is not a miscellaneous list for hiding things, at least > it's not any less miscellaneous than debian-vote. -project is listed as "Miscellaneous Debian" on http://lists.debian.org while -vote is "Development". If you feel that's wrong, please file a bug. Regards, -- MJ Ray http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html tel:+44-844-4437-237 - Webmaster-developer, statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder, consumer and workers co-operative member http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ - Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
