[me] > > Is this intended to bypass the NEW process currently done by ftpmasters > > any time something is added to non-free?
[Robert Millan] > ACK about your concerns (and the ones pointed by others, which are roughly > the same). Do you have any suggestion on what would be a better approach? Well, unless you explicitly want to undermine the authority of ftpmaster over NEW processing, which I do not advise[*], I would say "...may be done by any developer, subject to verification by the ftpmaster role." I think this makes it clear that the NEW processing that happens as a result of adding something to non-free would _not_ be bypassed in this case - unless, of course, the ftpmasters actually want that. -- Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/ [*] It is absurd to even _have_ mandatory NEW processing by ftpmasters if we don't trust them to use it correctly in the cases covered by your proposal. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]