On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:54:35PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Monday 27 October 2008 20:36, Robert Millan wrote: > > - We give priority to the timely release of Lenny over sorting every bit > > out - for this reason, we will > > - treat removal of sourceless firmware as a best-effort process > > *and* > > - deliver > > - firmware in udebs as long as it is necessary for > > installation (like all udebs) *and* > > - firmware included in the kernel itself as part of Debian > > Lenny as long as we are legally allowed to do so, and the firmware is > > distributed upstream under a license that complies with the DFSG. > > Aeh, if we'd vote on this, would that mean that we could deliver the firmware > in udebs but not in debs? > > Not all debian installers use udebs, fai for example doesnt and I'm sure > there > are others...
How about making it less specific, like: "... deliver firmware as part of Debian Lenny as long as ..." -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]