On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:13:24AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > So, we right now have an option that effectively stops the proposal as > > > it is at present. > > > > > > I wonder if we should haven an option on the ballot that asks the DAM to > > > basically go forward with their idea, explicitly authorizing them to > > > merge the DM setup in to it? > > > > I think that this is orthogonal, and should be a seperate resolution, > > not an option in this resolution. > > So you would prefer having "Further Discussion" be the de-facto go-ahead > option? >
No please. You can disagree with both: this GR and Joerg's proposal. Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
