On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 09:56:43PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote: > I read it as stating that we assume firmwares to be under a DFSG compliant > license that does not violate the GPL when linked into the kernel. The > kernel is GPL and the firmwares may be under a variety of licenses that do > not violate the GPL (BSD, etc). I also read #5 as implying that firmwares > constitute source. None of those cases require a super majority as long as > you actually believe that firmware constitutes "source" (which it may, in > some rare cases).
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/09/msg00580.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/09/msg00599.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/10/msg00007.html http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_007 -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
