On 16/12/08 at 06:55 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 01:22:06PM +0000, devo...@vote.debian.org wrote: > > The winners are: > > Option 2 "Invite the DAM to further discuss until vote or consensus, > > leading to a new proposal." > > which, aiui was the original resolution, namely: > [...]
Thank you for the detailed analysis. You missed one point: Excluding votes where more than one option were ranked first, and counting only first choices, we get the following results: Option 1: 93 Option 2: 90 Option 3: 61 Option 4: 12 "Invalid" votes (more than one first choice): 20 So, using plurality voting, we would have had a different result than the one we had with condorcet. This is actually quite rare: it happened with the debian-private declassification vote in 2005 (option 1 was the plurality winner), and in the 2003 DPL election (Branden Robinson was the plurality winner). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
