On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 06:07:43PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > Rank "Further discussion" first. That's our best way to say "I think > > this vote is wrong". > But that will delay even further Lenny release; I think that a simple > vote like the one dato proposed is what is needed to let us move > forward a release.
Nope, this is kinda FUD.
In the absence of a vote outcome, everything continues as the GR
wasn't there, hence the release team can do its job and make a release
as they please.
Things would have been different if the GR text had appealed to
constitution §4.2.2 (provided one can find a decision to be put on
hold), but this is not the case.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
