On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Matthew Johnson wrote: > On Sat Mar 14 14:23, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > > I'm currently inclined to interprete it so that anything that > > seems to modify an interpretation will require an explicit change > > in some document. But I'm not sure it's in my power to refuse > > an option that doesn't do so. So that would be option 2 above. > > Yeah, this is what I think too, but Manoj got a lot of flack about it, > hence why I want to make it explicit.
It depends what "some document" means. If it's a foundation document, then it's all wrong for me. If it's some external document that explains how we interpret the foundation documents, then it's ok. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Contribuez à Debian et gagnez un cahier de l'admin Debian Lenny : http://www.ouaza.com/wp/2009/03/02/contribuer-a-debian-gagner-un-livre/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
