Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> wrote: > MJ Ray <m...@phonecoop.coop> writes: > > I hope that others will support this debian and co-op view. > > I continue to object to this GR as currently worded because it is a > stealth delegate override that doesn't clearly state its implications and > effects. I encourage all DDs to not second it until it's been fixed, even > if you agree with the substance.
Did the delegates decide this particular matter or was Bug #495721 merely a summary of current practice? The statement there seemed incomplete in significant ways. Also, I think we should let the secretary to decide if a GR proposal modifies some foundation document, overrides a delegate decision, or requires amendment to be valid, rather than withholding seconds. I'm not that great at bureaucracy, so I think it's better that only the secretary decides the rules, rather than having every DD try to use the rule book as a weapon. Hope that explains, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
