Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> writes: > On Fri, 01 May 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > On Fri, May 01 2009, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > Only as binding as we as a group consider them to be. > > > > Hmm. Certainly puts the social contract in a new light, though. > > It really shouldn't; as a group we decide whether we're going to > uphold the social contract. There's no way to force the group to > uphold it.
That doesn't mean we can't make the explicit expectation that everyone in the group *will* uphold it, as a condition of being in the group. I had thought that expectation was embodied in the requirement for all new members to declare they will uphold it. -- \ “Software patents provide one more means of controlling access | `\ to information. They are the tool of choice for the internet | _o__) highwayman.” —Anthony Taylor | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org