Charles Plessy wrote: > 2) I think that the Debian operating system is defined by the interaction of > its binary version and the source files necessary to use, study, modifiy > and > redistribute it. Non-DFSG-free files that happen to be codistributed with > the > source of the Debian operating system but have no function at all are not > part > of the system, and I would like maintainers to be allowed to keep these > files > in the original upstream material if it simplifies their work.
Would that include files which we are not allowed to distribute (for whatever reason)? Do you think that the number of packages where the source had to be repackages is high enough to warrant a change of the DFSG? Thanks and cheers, Bernd -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79 ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ba615d8.5030...@bzed.de
