Le Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:03:00AM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit :
> 
> I find that attitude problematic. When electing a DPL we get a package
> deal. Some of each candidates ideas are liked by some/many, others
> disliked by some/many. It would be a shame to throw out good ideas
> with bad ones.

Le Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:16:41AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert a écrit :
> 
>  - A good idea should (unless its constitutional required, but what is?)
>    not be bound to a DPL term.
>  - A lost election might not mean that the ideas are all bad. (It can
>    mean it). It might just mean they are presented wrong, or that
>    everyone thinks they got presented wrong/at wrong time/at wrong
>    place.

Hi Joerg and Paul,

you are completely right, and that why I moderated my comment by finishing it
with ‘in the short term’ :)

Cheers,

-- 
Charles


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100329072751.ga4...@kunpuu.plessy.org

Reply via email to