Le Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 06:56:01PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > My own preference is [B] > [A] > [original GR proposal]. But I'd like to > hear some other opinions before working on a draft amendment for either > [A] or [B].
Hi Lucas and everybody, after seeing the torrent of seconds, I am still puzzled if this GR is a progress or a regression: is the take home message that Debian should be more open, or that some members must not have upload rights ? When a member does not have upload rights, is it for the principle of least needed priviledge, which suggests that getting that prividedge may be granted automaticaly later with the need, or because that member is not trusted to be able to upload correctly ? I would welcome clarifications in the GR text. Alternatively, I am willing to second amendements like the ones you propose, or to help with the drafting if you need. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100915011705.gb29...@merveille.plessy.net