On Tue, 05 Oct 2010, Russ Allbery wrote: > I get bitten by this every time and it drives me nuts. I realize > that the point of sending out the ballot before the opening of > voting is so that, if there are last minute errors, they can be > corrected before any votes are counted, but my reaction upon seeing > the ballot is always to vote right away.
Probably it'd be enough to send the preliminary ballot to -vote, with an appropriate reply-to set[1], but just reject any messages to the address. When the voting period starts, send the final ballot to -announce using at or similar. Don Armstrong 1: maybe also ░█▀▄░█▀▄░█▀█░█▀▀░▀█▀ ░█░█░█▀▄░█▀█░█▀▀░░█░ ░▀▀░░▀░▀░▀░▀░▀░░░░▀░ or similar. (toilet -f pagga draft) -- I now know how retro SCOs OSes are. Riotous, riotous stuff. How they had the ya-yas to declare Linux an infant OS in need of their IP is beyond me. Upcoming features? PAM. files larger than 2 gigs. NFS over TCP. The 80's called, they want their features back. -- Compactable Dave http://www3.sympatico.ca/dcarpeneto/sco.html http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101006003713.ge3...@rzlab.ucr.edu
