[Matthew Vernon] > I would like to propose, therefore, the requirement that anyone > proposing a GR be required to provide a short (no more than, say, 500 > words) summary of why they believe the GR to be necessary. A similar > requirement would apply to those proposing an amendment.
If the rationale is a required part of a GR, should it be treated as normative or informative? In other words, if I agree with the text of a GR, but disagree with its posted rationale, am I supposed to vote for or against it? -- Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110314185704.ga30...@p12n.org
